000 05917cam a2200625Ma 4500
001 ocn911848996
003 OCoLC
005 20200709060350.0
006 m d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 150626s2011 xx o 000 0 eng d
040 _aIDEBK
_beng
_epn
_cIDEBK
_dOCLCQ
_dEBLCP
_dYDXCP
_dJSTOR
_dOCLCQ
_dOCLCO
_dOCLCQ
_dN$T
019 _a911247168
_a930707122
_a932310669
020 _a0227903285
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _a9780227903285
_q(electronic bk.)
035 _a1004951
_b(N$T)
035 _a(OCoLC)911848996
_z(OCoLC)911247168
_z(OCoLC)930707122
_z(OCoLC)932310669
037 _a801302
_bMIL
037 _a22573/ctt1cg891p
_bJSTOR
050 4 _aPA849
072 7 _aLAN009000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aREL006100
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a225.6
_223
049 _aMAIN
100 1 _aSim, Margaret G.
245 1 0 _aMarking Thought and Talk in New Testament Greek
_h[electronic resource].
260 _aHavertown, United States :
_bJames Clarke & Co,
_c2011.
300 _a1 online resource (238)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
588 0 _aPrint version record.
505 0 _aFront Cover; Title Page; Copyright Information; Contents; Foreword; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; CHAPTER 1. Introduction; 1.1 Background to Study; 1.2 Problem to be Addressed; 1.3 Review of Scholarly Opinion; 1.3.1 Classical Greek -- Grammars; 1.3.2 Koine Greek; 1.3.2.1 TRADITIONAL GRAMMARS; 1.3.2.2 PARTICULAR PROPOSALS FOR THE USE OF hina; 1.3.2.3 ANALYSIS PRESENTED BY GREEK GRAMMARIANS; 1.4 Corpus; 1.5 Theoretical Basis for Book; 1.6 Arrangement of Chapters; 1.7 Summary; CHAPTER 2. Theoretical Basis for Study; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Relevance Theory; 2.2.1 General Background.
505 8 _a2.2.2 Delineation of Theory2.2.2.1 INFERENCES; 2.2.2.2 HOW INFERENCES ARE SAID TO BE DRAWN; 2.2.2.3 CONDITIONS FOR SUCCESSFUL COMMUNICATION; 2.2.2.4 UNDERDETERMINACY; 2.2.2.4.1 SHARED CONTEXTUAL ASSUMPTIONS; 2.2.2.4.2 UNDERDETERMINACY IN PARTICIPLES; 2.2.2.4.3 UNDERDETERMINACY IN PARTICLES; 2.2.2.5 METAREPRESENTATION; 2.2.2.6 PROCEDURAL MARKERS; 2.2.2.7 OSTENSIVE BEHAVIOUR; 2.3 Purpose or Intention in Koine; 2.4 Summary; CHAPTER 3. Independent Clauses Introduced by hina; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Use of hina to Give an Answer to a Question; 3.3 Question and Answer by the Same Speaker.
505 8 _a3.3.1 Examples from Polybius and Epictetus3.3.2 New Testament Examples; 3.4 Expressing Desire and Intention; 3.4.1 Johannine Examples; 3.4.2 Examples from Orators and Rhetoricians; 3.4.2.1 DEMOSTHENES; 3.4.2.2 DIONYSIUS OF HALICARNASSUS; 3.4.3 Examples from Septuagint and Non-Literary Papyri; 3.4.3.1 SEPTUAGINT; 3.4.3.2 EXAMPLES FROM THE PAPYRI; 3.4.4 Examples from the Epistles; 3.5 Introducing a Quotation from the Old Testament; 3.6 Indicating Speaker's Interpretation; 3.7 Reporting the Thoughts or Speech of Others; 3.8 Summary; CHAPTER 4. Requests, Commands, Prayers Introduced by hina.
505 8 _a4.1 Introduction4.2 Authorial Choice; Table 1; 4.3. Synoptic Examples in Indirect Command; 4.3.1 Healing of Jairus' Daughter; Matthew 9:18; Mark 5:23; Luke 8:41, 42; 4.3.1.1 MATTHEW 9:18; 4.3.1.2 MARK 5:23; 4.3.1.3 LUKE 8:41, 42; 4.3.1.4 CONCLUSION; 4.3.2 The Healing of a Boy with a Demon: Matthew 17:15, 16; Mark 9:17, 18; Luke 9:38, 40; 4.3.2.1 MATTHEW 17:15, 16; 4.3.2.2 MARK 9:17, 18.; 4.3.2.3 LUKE 9:38, 40; 4.3.2.4 CONCLUSION; 4.3.3 The Healing of the Demon Possessed Man: Matthew 8:34; Mark 5:17; Luke 8:37; 4.3.3.1 MATTHEW 8:34; 4.3.3.2 MARK 5:17; 4.3.3.3 LUKE 8:37.
505 8 _a4.3.3.4 CONCLUSION4.3.4 Authorial Choice in Same Context; 4.4 Examples from Literary Koine; 4.4.1 Examples from Dionysius of Halicarnassus; 4.4.2 Examples from Polybius; 4.4.3 Examples from Epictetus; 4.5 Summary; CHAPTER 5. Noun Clauses Introduced by hina; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Review of Metarepresentation; 5.3 Explication of a Noun, Adjective or Demonstrative; 5.3.1 Adjectives in Stative Clauses; 5.3.1.1 NEW TESTAMENT EXAMPLES; 5.3.1.2 EXAMPLES FROM THE DISCOURSES OF EPICTETUS; 5.3.2 Nouns and Demonstratives in Stative Clauses; 5.3.3 Nouns in Non-Stative Clauses Complemented by hina Clauses.
520 _aThis book uses insights from a modern theory of communication, Relevance Theory, to examine the function of the particle i(/na [SET IN SpIonic] in New Testament Greek. It claims that the particle does not have a lexical meaning of ""in order that, "" contrary to accepted wisdom, but that it alerts the reader to expect an interpretation of the thought or attitude of the implied speaker or author. Evidence is adduced from pagan Greek and in particular the writings of Polybius, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and Epictetus, as well as the New Testament. The implications of this claim give an opportuni.
590 _aAdded to collection customer.56279.3
630 0 0 _aBible.
_pNew Testament
_xLanguage, style.
630 0 4 _aBible. -- New testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
630 0 4 _aBible. -- New testament -- Translating.
650 0 _aGreek language, Biblical
_xParticles.
650 4 _aGreek language, Biblical
_xContext.
650 4 _aGreek language, Biblical
_xParticles.
650 7 _aLANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES
_xLinguistics
_xGeneral.
_2bisacsh
655 4 _aElectronic books.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aSim, Margaret G.
_tMarking Thought and Talk in New Testament Greek : New Light from Linguistics on the Particles 'hina' and 'hoti'.
_dHavertown : James Clarke & Co, ©2011
_z9780227173770
856 4 0 _3EBSCOhost
_uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1004951
938 _aEBL - Ebook Library
_bEBLB
_nEBL2071133
938 _aIngram Digital eBook Collection
_bIDEB
_ncis28118132
938 _aYBP Library Services
_bYANK
_n12475065
938 _aEBSCOhost
_bEBSC
_n1004951
994 _a92
_bN$T
999 _c56287
_d56287