000			03980cam a2200673Ii 4500
001			ocn908447726
003			OCoLC
005			20200709060345.0
006			m d
007			cr cnu|||unuuu
008			150506s2015 enk ob 000 0 eng d
040			_aN$T _beng _erda _epn _cN$T _dN$T _dE7B _dCDX _dEBLCP _dIDEBK _dYDXCP _dVLB _dOCLCQ _dOCLCF _dJSTOR
019			_a908632021 _a908671472 _a923217815 _a929119724
020			_a9780227904572 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a0227904575 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_z9780227175279
035			_a(OCoLC)908447726 _z(OCoLC)908632021 _z(OCoLC)908671472 _z(OCoLC)923217815 _z(OCoLC)929119724
037			_a779924 _bMIL
037			_a22573/ctt1cg82j2 _bJSTOR
050		4	_aBS2585.52 _b.L86 2015eb
072		7	_aREL _x006710 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aREL _x006220 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aREL006100 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a226.306 _223
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aLunn, Nicholas P., _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aThe Original Ending of Mark : _ba New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20 / _cNicholas P. Lunn.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bJames Clarke & Co., _c[2015]
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
588	0		_aVendor-supplied metadata.
505	0		_aFront cover; Half title; Title page; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; 1. Introduction; 2. External Evidence (1): Biblical Manuscripts; 3. External Evidence (2): Patristic Citations; 4. Linguistic Evidence (1): Vocabulary and Style; 5. Linguistic Evidence (2): Other Features; 6. Literary Evidence; 7. Thematic Evidence; 8. The Longer Ending and the Gospels: The Question of Dependence; 9. Miscellaneous Issues; 10. The Cause of the Problem; 11. Summary and Conclusion; Bibliography; Back cover.
520			_aAlthough traditionally accepted by the church through the centuries, the longer ending of Mark's Gospel (16:9-20) has been relegated by modern scholarship to the status of a later appendage. The arguments for such a view are chiefly based upon the witness of the two earliest complete manuscripts of Mark, and upon matters of language and style. This work shows that these primary grounds of argumentation are inadequate. It demonstrates that the church fathers knew the Markan ending from the very earliest days, well over two centuries before the earliest extant manuscripts. The quantity of unique.
590			_aMaster record variable field(s) change: 072
630	0	0	_aBible. _pMark _xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pNew Testament _xCriticism, Textual.
630	0	7	_aBible. _pMark. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01892928
630	0	7	_aBible. _pNew Testament. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01808090
650		4	_aBible. Mark _xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
650		4	_aBible. New Testament _xCriticism, Textual.
650		4	_aBible. New Testament _xManuscipts, Greek.
650		7	_aRELIGION _xBiblical Studies _xJesus, the Gospels & Acts. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aRELIGION _xBiblical Studies _xNew Testament. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aRELIGION / Biblical Criticism & Interpretation / New Testament _2bisacsh
655		4	_aElectronic books.
655		7	_aCriticism, interpretation, etc. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01411635
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aLunn, Nicholas P. _tOriginal Ending of Mark : A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20. _dHavertown : James Clarke & Co, ©2015 _z9780227175279
856	4	0	_3EBSCOhost _uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=988169
938			_aCoutts Information Services _bCOUT _n30562260
938			_aEBL - Ebook Library _bEBLB _nEBL2041755
938			_aebrary _bEBRY _nebr11052157
938			_aEBSCOhost _bEBSC _n988169
938			_aIngram Digital eBook Collection _bIDEB _ncis30562260
938			_aYBP Library Services _bYANK _n12413289
994			_a92 _bN$T
999			_c56242 _d56242