| 000 | 03571cam a2200517Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ocn915158122 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20200709060250.0 | ||
| 006 | m d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 150731t20142014oru ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aN$T _beng _erda _epn _cN$T _dN$T |
||
| 020 |
_a9781630875206 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
| 020 |
_a1630875201 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
| 020 | _z9781625646286 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)915158122 | ||
| 035 |
_a879612 _b(N$T) |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aBS2585.52 _b.L86 2014 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aREL _x006710 _2bisacsh |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aREL _x006220 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a226.306 _223 |
| 049 | _aN$TA | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aLunn, Nicholas P., _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe original ending of Mark : _ba new case for the authenticity of Mark 16:9-20 / _cNicholas P. Lunn. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aEugene, Ore. : _bPickwick Publications, _c[2014] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2014 | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 588 | 0 | _aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (Ebsco, viewed Aug. 4, 2015). | |
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- External evidence (1): biblical manuscripts -- External evidence (2): patristic concerns -- Linguistic evidence (1): vocabulary and style -- Linguistic evidence (2): other features -- Literary evidence -- Thematic evidence -- The longer ending and the Gospels : the question of dependence -- Miscellaneous issues -- The cause of the problem -- Summary and conclusion. | |
| 520 | _a"Although traditionally accepted by the church down through the centuries, the longer ending of Mark's Gospel (16:9-20) has been relegated by modern scholarship to the status of a later appendage. The arguments for such a view are chiefly based upon the witness of the two earliest complete manuscripts of Mark, and upon matters of language and style. This work shows that these primary grounds of argumentation are inadequate. It is demonstrated that the church fathers knew the Markan ending from the very earliest days, well over two centuries before the earliest extant manuscripts. The quantity of unique terms in the ending is also seen to fall within the parameters exhibited by undisputed Markan passages. Strong indications of Markan authorship are found in the presence of specific linguistic constructions, a range of literary devices, and the continuation of various themes prominent within the body of the Gospel. Furthermore, the writings of Luke show that the Gospel of Mark known to this author contained the ending. Rather than being a later addition, the evidence is interpreted in terms of a textual omission occurring at a later stage in transmission, probably in Egypt during the second century."--Back cover | ||
| 630 | 0 | 0 |
_aBible. _pMark _xCriticism, interpretation, etc. |
| 630 | 0 | 0 |
_aBible. _pNew Testament _xCriticism, Textual. |
| 630 | 0 | 0 |
_aBible. _pNew Testament _xManuscipts, Greek. |
| 650 | 7 |
_aRELIGION / Biblical Studies / Jesus, the Gospels & Acts _2bisacsh |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aRELIGION / Biblical Studies / New Testament _2bisacsh |
|
| 655 | 4 | _aElectronic books. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _aLunn, Nicholas P. _tOriginal ending of Mark. _dEugene, Ore. : Pickwick Publications, c2014 _z9781625646286 _w(DLC) 2015300546 _w(OCoLC)893452327 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_3EBSCOhost _uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=879612 |
| 938 |
_aEBSCOhost _bEBSC _n879612 |
||
| 910 | _acpp3254 | ||
| 994 |
_a02 _bN$T |
||
| 999 |
_c55672 _d55672 |
||