000 03372nam a2200553Ki 4500
001 ocn893973954
003 OCoLC
005 20200709060223.0
006 m d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 141029s2010 oru ob 001 0 eng d
040 _aN$T
_beng
_erda
_epn
_cN$T
020 _a9781630874223
_qelectronic bk.
020 _a1630874221
_qelectronic bk.
020 _z160608741X
020 _z9781606087411
035 _a(OCoLC)893973954
035 _a845595
_b(N$T)
050 4 _aBS659
_b.W43 2010eb
072 7 _aREL
_x067000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a231.7/652
_222
049 _aN$TA
100 1 _aWebb, Stephen H.,
_d1961-
245 1 0 _aDome of eden :
_ba new solution to the problem of creation and evolution /
_cStephen H. Webb.
264 1 _aEugene, Or. :
_bWipf and Stock Publishers,
_c©2010.
300 _a1 online resource (vii, 366 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and an index.
520 _aThis book does not try to harmonize evolution and creation. Harmonizers typically begin with Darwinism and then try to add just enough religion to make evolution more palatable, or they begin with Genesis and pry open the creation account just wide enough to let in a little bit of evolution. By contrast, Stephen Webb provides a theory of how evolution and theology fit together, and he argues that this kind of theory is required by the internal demands of both theology and biology. The Dome of Eden also develops a theological account of evolution that is distinct from the intelligent design movement. Webb shows how intelligent design properly discerns the inescapable dimension of purpose in nature but, like Darwinism itself, fails to make sense of the problem of natural evil. Finally, this book draws on the work of Karl Barth to advance a new reading of the Genesis narrative and the theology of Duns Scotus to provide the necessary metaphysical foundation for evolutionary thought - Publisher info.
505 0 _aThe theory that would not die -- Re-trying scopes: what Machen would have done to Darrow -- Three rival theories and the problem of natural evil -- The five theses -- Karl Barth on the edge of the gap -- The dome of domes divides the world -- Could Jesus have been an octopus? (Dunes Scotus replies to Darwin) -- An ethics of pets vs. the Darwinian sublime -- The nature of naturalism.
588 0 _aPrint version record.
650 0 _aBible and evolution.
650 0 _aEvolution
_xReligious aspects
_xChristianity.
650 0 _aGood and evil.
650 0 _aTheodicy.
650 7 _aBible and evolution.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00831210
650 7 _aEvolution
_xReligious aspects
_xChristianity.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00917284
650 7 _aGood and evil.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00944894
650 7 _aTheodicy.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst01149507
650 7 _aRELIGION / Christian Theology / General
_2bisacsh
655 4 _aElectronic books.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aWebb, Stephen H., 1961-
_tDome of eden
_z160608741X
_w(DLC) 2009292667
_w(OCoLC)494691569
856 4 0 _3EBSCOhost
_uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=845595
938 _aEBSCOhost
_bEBSC
_n845595
910 _acpp1723AUTO
994 _a02
_bN$T
999 _c55429
_d55429