000 04354cam a2200589Mu 4500
001 ocn851972138
003 OCoLC
005 20200709055858.0
006 m d
007 cr |n|
008 130706s2012 gw o 000 0 eng d
040 _aEBLCP
_beng
_epn
_cEBLCP
_dOCLCQ
_dIDEBK
_dN$T
020 _a9783110325881 (electronic bk.)
020 _a3110325888 (electronic bk.)
035 _a(OCoLC)851972138
035 _a603611
_b(N$T)
050 4 _aB3245
072 7 _aPHI
_x016000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a193
049 _aN$TA
245 0 0 _aOntological proofs today
_h[electronic resource] /
_cMiroslaw Szatkowski.
260 _aBerlin :
_bDe Gruyter,
_c2012.
300 _a1 online resource (522 pages).
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aPhilosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis
505 0 _aAcknowledgements; Authors of Contributed Papers; Part I. Introduction; 1. Guided Tour of the Book: Ontological Proofs Today; Part II. Interpretation of Old Ontological Proofs. God's Attributes; 2. Ratio Anselmi; 3. Two Ontological Arguments for the Existence of an Omniscient Being; 4. A Modal Theistic Argument; 5. A Debate on God: Anselm, Aquinas and Scotus; 6. Three Versions of the Ontological Argument; Part III. New Ontological Proofs; 7. More Modest Ontological Argument; 8. A New Modal Version of the Ontological Argument.
505 8 _a9. A Cosmo-Ontological Argument for the Existence of a First Cause -- perhaps God10. A Gödelian Ontological Argument Improved Even More; Part IV. Semantics for Ontological Proofs; 11. Logic of Existence, Ontological Frames, Leibniz's and Gödel's Ontological Proofs; 12. Fully Free Semantics for Anderson-like Ontological Proofs; Part V. Ontological Proofs and Kinds of Necessity; 13. Conceptual Modality and Ontological Argument; 14. Does the Kind of Necessity which Is Represented by S5 Capture a Theologically Defensible Notion of a Necessary Being?; 15. Modal Collapse in Gödel's Ontological Proof.
505 8 _a16. What Kind of Necessary Being Could God Be?Part VI. Ontological Proofs and Formal Ontology; 17. On Grim's Cantorian Anti-Ontological Argument; 18. Concepts of Proof and Formalized Arguments ex gradibus perfectionis; 19. Onto/Logical Melioration; 20. Doomed to Fail: The Sad Epistemological Fate of Ontological Arguments; 21. The Premises of Anselm's Argument; Part VII. Debate Maydole-Oppy; 22. Maydole on Ontological Arguments; 23. Ontological Arguments Redux; 24. Response to Maydole; 25. Reply to Oppy's Response to "Ontological Redux"; Author Index; Subject Index.
520 _aThe book Ontological Proofs Today, apart from the introduction, consists of six parts. Part II comprises papers each of which pertains either to historical ontological arguments, or to some other, rather new, ontological arguments, but what makes them stand out from the other papers in this volume, is the fact that they all treat of the omniscience or the omnipotence of God. Part III includes papers which introduce new ontological arguments for the existence of God, without referring to omniscience and omnipotence as the transparent attributes of God. The issue of the type of necessity with wh.
588 _aDescription based on print version record.
650 0 _aOntology.
650 0 _aGod
_xProof, Ontological.
650 0 _aReligion
_xPhilosophy.
650 4 _aGod
_xProof, Ontological.
650 4 _aOntology.
650 4 _aReligion
_xPhilosophy.
650 7 _aPHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern
_2bisacsh
655 4 _aElectronic books.
700 1 _aSzatkowski, Miroslaw.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aSzatkowski, Miroslaw.
_tOntological Proofs Today.
_dBerlin : De Gruyter, ©2012
_z9783110325157
830 0 _aPhilosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis.
856 4 0 _3Ebook Library
_uhttp://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=1215592
856 4 0 _uhttp://lib.myilibrary.com?id=503355
856 4 0 _3EBSCOhost
_uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=603611
938 _aEBL - Ebook Library
_bEBLB
_nEBL1215592
938 _aIngram Digital eBook Collection
_bIDEB
_ncis25806936
938 _aEBSCOhost
_bEBSC
_n603611
910 _acpp1723AUTO
994 _a02
_bN$T
999 _c53480
_d53480