000			03814nam a2200625Ka 4500
001			ocn829713374
003			OCoLC
005			20200709055726.0
006			m d
007			cr cnu---unuuu
008			130311s2006 enk ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aN$T _cN$T
020			_a9781107322042 (electronic bk.)
020			_a1107322049 (electronic bk.)
020			_z0521862663
020			_z9780521862660
020			_z0521681146
020			_z9780521681148
035			_a(OCoLC)829713374
035			_a527572 _b(N$T)
050		4	_aB3258.H324 _bA52 2006eb
072		7	_aREL _x051000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a210 _222
084			_a08.37 _2bcl
049			_aN$TA
100	1		_aAdams, Nicholas, _d1970-
245	1	0	_aHabermas and theology _h[electronic resource] / _cNicholas Adams.
260			_aCambridge, UK ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c2006.
300			_a1 online resource (ix, 267 p.)
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 256-264) and index.
505	0		_aReligion in public -- The ideal speech situation -- Authority and distance in tradition -- Sacred and profane -- Universalism -- Theology and political theory -- Theology, social theory and rationalization -- Modernity's triumph over theology -- Habermas in dialogue with theologians -- Narrative and argument -- Scriptural difference and scriptural reasoning.
520			_a"How can the world's religious traditions debate within the public sphere? In this book Nicholas Adams shows the importance of Habermas' approaches to this question. The full range of Habermas' work is considered, with detailed commentary on the more difficult texts. Adams energetically rebuts some of Habermas' arguments, particularly those which postulate the irrationality or stability of religious thought. Members of different religious traditions need to understand their own ethical positions as part of a process of development involving ongoing disagreements, rather than a stable unchanging morality. Public debate additionally requires learning each other's patterns of disagreement. Adams argues that, rather than suspending their deep reasoning to facilitate debate, as Habermas suggests, religious traditions must make their reasoning public, and that 'scriptural reasoning' is a possible model for this. Habermas overestimates the stability of religious traditions. This book offers a more realistic assessment of the difficulties and opportunities they face."--BOOK JACKET.
588			_aDescription based on print version record.
600	1	0	_aHabermas, Jürgen.
650		0	_aReligion _xPhilosophy.
650		7	_aTheologie. _2gtt
650		7	_aPolitieke theorie. _2gtt
650		7	_aPubliek domein. _2gtt
600	1	6	_aHabermas, Jürgen.
650		6	_aReligion _xPhilosophie.
600	1	7	_aHabermas, Jürgen _2swd
650	0	7	_aTheologie _2swd
600	1	7	_aHabermas, Jürgen _d(1929-....) _xCritique et interprétation. _2ram
650		7	_aPhilosophie de la religion. _2ram
650		7	_aRELIGION / Philosophy _2bisacsh
655		4	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aAdams, Nicholas, 1970- _tHabermas and theology. _dCambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2006 _z0521862663 _w(DLC) 2006298232 _w(OCoLC)65203243
856	4	0	_3EBSCOhost _uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=527572
856	4	1	_3Table of contents only _uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0668/2006298232-t.html
856	4	2	_3Contributor biographical information _uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0733/2006298232-b.html
856	4	2	_3Publisher description _uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0668/2006298232-d.html
938			_aEBSCOhost _bEBSC _n527572
910			_acpp1723AUTO
994			_a02 _bN$T
999			_c52478 _d52478