04821cam a2200505Mu 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.0m        d        cr |n|120528s2012    ne      o     000 0 eng d  aEBLCPbengcEBLCPdOCLCQdN$T  a9789004227996 (electronic bk.)  a9004227997 (electronic bk.)  a(OCoLC)794328554  a456875b(N$T) 4aBT213 7aRELx0670402bisacsh04a232.09015  aN$TA1 aGleede, Benjamin.14aThe Development of the Term??????????? from Origen to John of Damascush[electronic resource].  aLeiden :bBRILL,c2012.  a1 online resource (222 p.)1 aVigiliae Christianae, Supplements0 aAcknowledgements; Abbreviations; Introduction; Part I. The Pre-Neochalcedonian enupostatos-Tradition; 1. The Origin of the Term; 1.1. Basic Considerations; 1.2. Enupostatos -- A Genuinely Christian Theological Term; 1.2.1. Irenaeus?; 1.2.2. Origen; 1.2.3. Origin and the Genuine Meaning(s) of the Term; 2. Enupostatos as a Technical Term of Trinitarian Theology; 2.1. The Rise and Development of a Technical Usage during the Arian Controversy; 2.1.1. A First Instance of Theological Relevance: The Letter of the Six Bishops.8 a2.1.2. A 'Third Kind' of Logos: proforikos, endiathetos, enupostatos2.1.3. The Hypostatical Independence of the Logos in the Creeds; 2.2. The Establishment of the Technical Usage in Late Fourth- and Early Fifth-Century Authors; 2.2.1. Ps-Athanasius and Didymus; 2.2.2. Epiphanius of Salamis; 2.2.3. John Chrysostom; 2.2.4. Cyril of Alexandria; Part II. The Christological Application of enupostatos; Introduction; 3. enupostatos, the 'Insubsistence Formula', Their Connection and Relevance for Post-Chalcedonian Christology during the Sixth-Century Debate.8 a3.1. John the Grammarian and the Introduction of enupostatos into the Christological Debate3.1.1. Enupostatos and Insubsistence in JohnÕs Apology for Chalcedon; 3.1.2. Background and Possible Sources; 3.2. Leontius of Byzantium and the Distinction between enupostaton and hupostasis; 3.2.1. Interpreting the ÔLocus ClassicusÕ; 3.2.2. Leontius and the Insubsistence Formula; 3.3. Philosophical Excursus: The Distinctio kath' hauto -- en alloi, the Problem of Substantial Qualities and Inexisting Natures; 3.3.1. Origin and Problems of the Distinction.8 a3.3.2. Attempted Solutions in the Later Commentaries on Aristotle3.3.3. Inherence of Accidents; 3.3.4. Inherence of Substantial Parts (Specific Differences, Substantial Qualities); 3.3.5. Inherence of Genera and Species; 3.3.5.1. The Problem of Participation; 3.3.5.2. The Problem of Individuation and Immattered Forms; 3.4. Ephrem of Amid; 3.5. Pamphilus the Theologian; 3.5.1. Pamphilus Reading Leontius of Byzantium; 3.5.2. Complementary Neochalcedonian Arguments: Pamphilus and the Insubsistence Formula.8 a3.6. De sectis, Anastasius of Antioch and the Christological Disadvantages of the Common Usage3.6.1. De sectis, Praxis VII; 3.6.2. Anastasius I. of Antioch, the Disadvantages of the Common Usage and the Systematical Problems of Insubsistence-Christology; 3.7. Leontius of Jerusalem; 3.7.1. Leontius' Usage of enupostatos; 3.7.2. Leontius and the Insubsistence Formula; 4. enupostatos, the 'Insubsistence Formula', Their Connection and Relevance for the Culmination of Chalcedonian Christological Thought; 4.1. Maximus the Confessor; 4.1.1. Maximus' Usage of enupostatos.  a4.1.2. The Insubsistence Formula in Maximus.  aExamining the usage of the term??????????? throughout the Patristic period, this study illustrates the gradual change in its meaning from stressing the hypostatical independence of the trinitarian persons to upholding the reality of Christ's two natures in his unique hypostasis.  aDescription based on print version record.00aJesus ChristxNaturesxHistory of doctrinesyEarly church, ca. 30-600. 0aHypostatic unionxHistory of doctrinesyEarly church, ca. 30-600. 7aRELIGION / Christian Theology / Christology2bisacsh 4aElectronic books.08iPrint version:aGleede, BenjamintDevelopment of the Term??????????? from Origen to John of DamascusdLeiden : BRILL, c2012z9789004224193 0aVigiliae Christianae, Supplements.403Ebook Libraryuhttp://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=919587403EBSCOhostuhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=456875  aEBL - Ebook LibrarybEBLBnEBL919587  acpp1723AUTO  a02bN$T  c51272d51272