1 and 2 Timothy, Titus / Gordon D. Fee ; New Testament editor, W. Ward Gasque.
Series: New international Biblical commentary ; 13.Publication details: Peabody, MA : Hendrickson Publishers, c1988.Edition: Rev. edDescription: xvii, 332 p. ; pbk ; 22 cmISBN:- 0943575109
- First and Second Timothy, Titus
- 227/.8307 20
- BS2735.3 .F44 1988
- BC 4800
- BC 4970
| Cover image | Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Materials specified | Vol info | URL | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | Item hold queue priority | Course reserves | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book
|
The Emmaus Library | 225 NT | 227.8307/FEE (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 2 | Available | 15461 | ||||||||||||
Book
|
The Emmaus Library | 225 NT | 227.8307/FEE (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 02873 |
Browsing The Emmaus Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | ||||||||
| 227.8306/ENT Entrusted with the Gospel : | 227.8306/KRO I suffer not a woman : | 227.8306/YAR Paul's utilization of preformed traditions in 1 Timothy : | 227.8307/FEE 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus / | 227.8307/FEE 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus / | 227.8307/MAR A critical and exegetical commentary on the Pastoral Epistles / | 227.8706/LEN The interpretation of the Epistle to the Hebrews and the Epistle of James / |
"Revised edition"--Pref.
Includes bibliographical references (p. [305]-313) and indexes.
1 Timothy -- Titus -- 2 Timothy.
The present edition of this commentary has been totally reset and rewritten to comment on the text of the New International Version (NIV). Nonetheless, it is still substantially the same as the original Good News Commentary, first published in 1984. These three letters (1 and 2 Timothy and Titus), called the Pastoral Epistles (PE) since the eighteenth century, purport to be letters from the Apostle Paul to two of his younger co-workers, whom he has left in charge of the churches in Ephesus and Crete, respectively. Since the early nineteenth century, however, when doubt was first expressed by F. Schleiermacher, a large array of arguments has been forthcoming that have called their authenticity into question, so that at present the large majority of NT (New Testament) scholars worldwide consider them not authored by Paul but by a pseudepigrapher (although a disciple of Paul), around the turn of the first century A.D. The present commentary has been written from the perspective of Pauline authorship, fully aware of the many difficulties that entails but convinced that theories of pseudepigraphy have even greater historical difficulties. - Introduction.
There are no comments on this title.

